jQuery('head').append('');
The blog's purpose is to have a place where everyone can comment on a video or ask extra questions about an update. A place where customers can share opinions and of course a place to give us your feedback for the stuff you are downloading / watching on the site.
Feel free to comment and share your thoughts or just read what other users have wrote about our updates.
You can reply to any comment by clicking on the T numbers.
Saturday, December 8, 2012
The pictures and the video was taken from different angles BUT both from the pool for the best angle possible.
I am sure that you can find a lot of these angles during the 20 minutes video.
webmaster (Saturday, December 8, 2012) in reply to:
Hello Attaboys,
I don't consider that it's a critical fault what the camera man did... It is however an angle mistake that when the models sit down into the pool and later on when they kiss the camera went on too close.
In the beginning the camera is on a wide angle, then the girls step into the water, Adria is starting to wet alex and the camera coes on closeup and then on super close-up on the clothes.
After that the camera is focused more on the upper part of the body for a minute and the water line disappears indeed.
The in between 7.10 and 8.20 indeed the camera is focusing more on the upper body and the water line disappears again , but that was only because he wanted to capture a close-up of the girls fondling each other's breasts thru the wet clothes.
Regarding your last question...
I think you should :), really... what we have here is 20 minutes of pretty nice lesbian action and plenty of time to enjoy the wetlook part and the kissing part and the girls kissing each other pussies thru the leggings / sport pants.
No bra wetlook with a lot of breast fondling and many wet kisses ;)
Thank you for the feedback tough... it's your opinion and I fully agree with it... The camera should of stayed a bit wider till the girls completely wet themselves.
I will pass the comment to the cameraman.
webmaster (Saturday, December 8, 2012) in reply to:
I would say stick to 1080 resolution, remember you done some of such scenes in wetrom times
attaboys (Saturday, December 8, 2012)
btw the "extra picture" angle is perfect of what you should see
attaboys (Saturday, December 8, 2012)
Ok, you will see by yoursilf, just check.
its wetlook, - wet clothes and contact of clothing with water, cameramans angle is too high when girls entering water and start soaking, it should be visible waterline, now all of it gone and lost, i understand him, he was focused on kissing and all, but forgot about wetlook:
check from:
4:37 to almoust 6:37
mostwhats left my jaw open was aprox from 7:10 to 8:20
your verdict? should I pay for this? :)
attaboys (Saturday, December 8, 2012)
Would be more exiting to see "girls hand"
attaboys (Saturday, December 8, 2012)
Friday, December 7, 2012
Hello Attaboy,
bring it on... I will pass the comments to the cameraman :)
webmaster (Friday, December 7, 2012) in reply to:
after watching this update I wanted to tear apart video cameraman :) should I point out why? ;]]
attaboys (Friday, December 7, 2012)
lets see... POV I see You thought well and finally trying POVs. Good. Try new things in wetlook, becouse nowadays all producers and all production looks same
attaboys (Friday, December 7, 2012)
Thank you guys for the feedback... I hope many customers (or at least all of our regular customers) will reply to the blog thread or will use the voting.
For us either version is ok... it's not a matter of space anymore, thank of all your orders we could afford to extend our hosting space recently so it will not be a problem.
Where the problem can arrise is when the customer don't have a powerful enough PC and the p3 will simply don't work at all.
Thank you for encouraging the people to post here their experience and based on all the feedback we will be able to deliver in 2013 the video in a widely accepted format.
The format btw will still be mp4... we experienced a little with mkv but since the mkv container uses the same h264 codec the results was not a lot different.
Thanks for the comments.
webmaster (Friday, December 7, 2012)
I totally agree with Steve on P2. It really really didn't work for me, but P3 was amazing!! I would go with the P3 version too.
The video was great and Reka fantastic and very sexy. I'm happy to contribute to your charity ;)
Keep it up ;)
kiss11 (Friday, December 7, 2012)
Thursday, December 6, 2012
I just want to say that its incredibly nice for having this charity update :) I remember that I bought the charity videos last year as well. This is why I love this site! Buy this video for charity!
Now to the topic at hand.
After downloading all p1, p2, p3
Here's my opinion,
P1, I don't mind keeping this for 1 more year, so it will give other users the chance to upgrade their pc's. I am very used to this format.
P2, I did not like this version, I thought the bit rate is to slow, I mean if we are going to upgrade we might as well go all out with option number 3, I don't think P2 is worth the space since its the same size as option P3.
P3, Absolutely high quality, very smooth, absolutely gorgeous. Looks good on my 1080p TV! Vote this!
In conclusion, I think the wait has been long enough and I voted for option P3, I cannot speak for all the users in this site, but I encourage users to choose carefully, vote P1 or P3, (DON'T vote for P2)
Also, it would be nice to hear more from other users with their experience, please voice your opinion in this blog.
It took me 25mins to download the 1080p P3 version, which is OK for me.
For other users: how long did it take you to download P3?
Lastly, Reka was awesome in this update
Thank you to the crew at EUROWAM,
I am looking forward to hear from other users as well.
:)
Steve (Thursday, December 6, 2012)
Tuesday, December 4, 2012
Hello John,
I am very sorry for the mistake. It was a mistype.
webmaster (Tuesday, December 4, 2012) in reply to:
But standing in the tags :
pool dunk; t-shirt; leggings; pantyhose; flip flops; wet; wetlook;
John (Tuesday, December 4, 2012) in reply to:
Hello Joe,
no pantyhose... bare feet and flip flops.
webmaster (Tuesday, December 4, 2012) in reply to:
Where is she wearing a pantyhose ?
I can not see
John (Tuesday, December 4, 2012)
Thanks for the feedback Kiss11 ;)
webmaster (Tuesday, December 4, 2012) in reply to:
I love that 4th picture of Ginger. That's a really nice picture of her all wet. Love it ;)
kiss11 (Tuesday, December 4, 2012)
Michaela is so HOT!!!!
kiss11 (Tuesday, December 4, 2012)
Monday, December 3, 2012
Gorgeous wet leggings! I love that she's barefoot too
K (Monday, December 3, 2012)